pbmax
Active Member
LJ is right. Arguably dwarf crays represent no danger to the ecology of this state in any way, shape, or form. They are, however, in the same taxonomic family as all of the rest of the north american crays, like procambarus clarkii. P. Clarkii have established invasive populations in this state thanks to fishermen using them as bait. So the geniuses in Olympia decided to use a scorched earth tactic (ban the family) instead of banning individual species.LuminousAphid said:So, was the issue for these that people were using them as bait or something, and they could have been released into native waters? I don't know what their temperature tolerance is, but if they are named the "cajun" crayfish, I can't imagine they like the rather cold rivers which come down from the mountains around here. By the time rivers get to cajun country, they should be a good 60-70F, and our rivers even near the sound average probably 50F at the warmest time of the year.
So, I'm curious as to why these are such a big issue?
I kept dwarf crays in the past - they were purchased before I fully understood the breadth of the law. Once I got my head on straight (or crooked, depending on how you look at it), I stopped buying crays and started spreading the word about the law. I don't like it either, not at all.
That said, the law is the law and this forum needs to adhere to it.